--1-- C.M.P. No. 166 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI C.M.P. No. 166 of 2025 ---- Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. having its Local office at Pranami Heights, 5th Floor, Circular Road, PO – Lalpur, PS – Lalpur, District – Ranchi, 834001, through its authorized signatory, Ms Rimpi Banerjee, aged 30 years, daughter of Sri U.K. Banerjee, resident of Dangratoli, Near Lalpur Chowk, PO – Lalpur, PS – Lalpur, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand, 834001 .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1. State of Jharkhand, through under Secretary, the Department of Food Distribution and Consumer Affairs, Project Bhawan, PO – Dhurwa, PS – Jagannathpur, District – Ranchi, 834004 2. Sardar Jaspal Singh, son of Sardar Joginder Singh, residents of Sanghi Colony, Joraphatak Road, PO – Joraphatak, PS – Joraphatak, District – Dhanbad, 826001 .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Siddharth Jyoti Roy, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Gyan Prakash Tiwari, Advocate :- Mr. Shray Mishra, Advocate ---- 02/07.03.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the respondent State. 2. This petition has been filed for modification of the order dated 27.08.2024 passed in of W.P.(C) No.4456 of 2024. 3. Mr. Siddharth Jyoti Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been disposed of and the said order was being in the knowledge of the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Dhanbad, however, the forum is proceeding in the matter and in view of that this petition has been filed for modification of the said order. 4. The writ petition was disposed of directing the petitioner to disclose --2-- C.M.P. No. 166 of 2025 all the facts before the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Dhanbad and the learned Forum was to take decision and in view of that the decision is taken and the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Dhanbad is proceeding in the matter that is a fresh cause of action and for that the petitioner is required to file a fresh writ petition or any proceeding before the appropriate forum. 5. The Court finds that there is no reason for modification is made out, as such this petition is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/