Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4953 (AP)

DUKKIREDDY VEERA REDDY & ANR v. YENAMALA RAGHURAMULU @ RAGHURAMAIAH & 6 ORS

CMA/71/2013 · 2025-07-16

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010040172013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 71/2013 Between: 1. DUKKIREDDY VEERA REDDY & ANR, S/O.PEDDA VEERA REDDY R/O.BOVILLAVARIPALLI [V], CHENNAMPALLI POST, BADVEL [M], KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SURA CHINNA VEERA REDDY, S/O.PEDDA VEERA REDDY R/O.BOVILLAVARIPALLI [V], CHENNAMPALLI POST, BADVEL [M], KADAPA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. YENAMALA RAGHURAMULU RAGHURAMAIAH, S/O.RAMAIAH R/O.6/1405, SANKARAPURAM, KADAPA. 2. KURUGUNTLA NMARASIMHULU NAIDU, S/O.PENCHAL NAIDU R/O.GUNTHAPALLI [V] AND POST, BADVEL [M], KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. TARAPANENI JAYARAM NAIDU, S/O.CHINNAIAH NAIDU R/O.7/265, ANJANEYANAGAR STREET, BADVEL [M], KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. KATTE SUBBAIAH, S/O.VENAKTA SUBBAIAH R/O.B.KAMMAVARIPALLI [V], EGUVA NELLATURU POST, B.MATTAM [M], KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. KANUPARTHI NAGESWAR REDDY, S/O.NAGI REDDY R/O.GODLA VEEDU [V], POONDLA CHENNUPALLI POST, B.MATTAM [M], KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. KARUGUNTLA RAMA NAIDU, S/O.PENCHAL NAIDU R/O.GUNTHAPALLI [V] AND POST, BADVEL [M], KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. KURUGUNTLA RAMAMOORTHY, S/O.PENCHAL NAIDU R/O.TUNTHAPALLI [V] AND POST, BADVEL [M], KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 149 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay temporary injunction restraining the respondents, their men, agents, associates and the persons claiming right through them from interfering with our peaceful possession and enjoyment of schedule property in any manner IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CMAMP 1345 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of C.M.A.No. 71/2013 and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No: 71 of 2013 JUDGMENT: Sri V.Teja, learned counsel representing Sri Karri Murali Krishna, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appeal has become infructuous and no further orders are necessary. 2. Recording, the above submission, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 17.07.2025 M K K THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.71 of 2013 Date: 17.07.2025 M K K 57