Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49525 (RAJ)

SURESH S/O HETRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12326/2025 · 2025-11-13

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12326/2025 Suresh S/o Hetram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Kheda Karoli, Police Station Kumher, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In District Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Singhal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/11/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.389/2024 registered at Police Station Kumher, District-Deeg for offences under Section 380 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner pertains to the theft from the house of the complainant. Though there are 16 cases pending against the petitioner but in 13 of those cases he has been acquitted. Charge-sheet has been filed. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.08.2025. No further custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required. The trial of the case may take [2025:RJ-JP:45557] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12326/2025] considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner-Suresh S/o Hetram be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Kumher District Deeg in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. [2025:RJ-JP:45557] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12326/2025] (iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/75