Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49524 (BOM)

PRAFUL S/O MUKUNDRAO KALKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PSO, PS RAJAPESH, AMRAVATI, DIST. AMRAVATI AND ANR.

BA/510/2025 · 2025-07-21

Urmila Joshi Phalke

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 23ba510.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 510 OF 2025 Praful s/o Mukundrao Kalkar Vs State of Maharashtra and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. P.R.Agrawal, counsel for applicant. Mr. N.R.Rode, APP for non-applicant/State. Ms. S.H. Bhatiya, counsel (appointed) for non-applicant No.2. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 21/07/2025. 1. This is an application for grant of bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Considering the facts of the case, I have shown my disinclination to grant bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to file after evidence of the victim is recorded. 4. The criminal application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file after recording of the evidence of the victim. 5. The fees of the appointed counsel be quantified as per Rule. [URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.] rkn 2025:BHC-NAG:7122