1 2025:CGHC:57429 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6189 of 2025 1 - Shri Shayamlal Arya S/o Dameshai Arya Aged About 38 Years R/o I- 11, Teena Line, Bajar Chowk, Rudri, Distt- Dhamtari Occupation- Peon Family Court, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Law And Legislative Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Registrar General High Court Of C.G. Bodri, Dist Bilaspur, C.G. District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Disciplinary Authority Family Court, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (C.G.) 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer Water Management Sub Division No.1 Gangrel, Dhamtari District Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Upasna Mehta, Dy. Government Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate along with Ms. Shalini Kashyap, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 26 /11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned order dated 06.11.2025 and 19.11.2025 issued by the Respondents No. 4 & 2 3 respectively (Annexure P/1) issued to the petitioner, and further direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the residential quarter till the disposal of the appeal before the Respondent No. 2. 10.2 Any other relief/relief’s which Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.” 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition though seeking the aforementioned reliefs, however, during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking further time to vacate the government quarter allotted to the petitioner subject matter of notice dated 06.11.2025 and 19.11.2025 (Annexure P/1). 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 2 opposes the submission of counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the documents placed on record. 5. Taking into consideration, facts and circumstances of the case, submission of counsel for the respective parties and further considering the nature of prayer made by the counsel for petitioner that the petitioner wants to vacate the government quarter allotted to him, however, he may be granted some breathing time to make some arrangement, this writ petition is dismissed on merits. However, considering the prayer of counsel for the petitioner, he is granted 01 month time to vacate the government quarter allotted to him. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY