[2025:RJ-JP:43518] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3737/2025 Neetu Shakla W/o Shri Niraj Kumar Mishra, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Gali No. 6, Shastri Colony, Ganeshpura Road, Kota Junction, Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Deputy Director, Women And Child Development Department, Purana Zila Parishad Bhawan, Opposite Mbs, Nayapura, Kota City, Kota. 3. Project Officer, Mahila And Bal Vikash Development Department, Nayapura, Kota City, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Meena for Mr. Chain Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 30/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “i) It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed with costs and by issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, impugned communication/letter dated 08.11.2024 may kindly be quashed and set aside and respondents may kindly be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Anganwadi Worker. ii) Respondent may kindly be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Anganwadi Worker at Anganwadi Centre, Bapu Colony, Ward no.24, Kota. iii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” [2025:RJ-JP:43518] (2 of 3) [CW-3737/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in pursuant to advertisement no. 2/2021 inviting application for engagement as Anganwadi worker, the petitioner has filed her application with 11 other applicants and after the selection process, three candidates were shortlisted wherein petitioner was selected as no.1 in merit list but she was not appointed on the post of Anganwadi worker. He further submitted that the petitioner has filed a civil suit till date the post is lying vacant, and respondents are trying to engage other person. 3. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioner and also taking note of submissions along with material, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with direction to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the respondent(s). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:43518] (3 of 3) [CW-3737/2025] 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /41