Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49519 (AP)

Smt. Gorji Rama v. The Chairman and Managing Director,

WP/23574/2015 · 2025-05-04

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

I* IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMAR^^T^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23574 OF 2015 Between: 1. Smt. Gorji Rama, W/o Gedela Ramesh, Aged 45 years, Occ: Floor, Venkatarama Towers, St Housewife, R/o Flat No. 11 & 12, 1 Gadevari Street, Powerpet, Eluru, West Godavari District. 2. Karpuram Seshagiri Rao, S/o. Nagabushanam, Aged 69 years, Occ; Floor, Venkatarama Towers, Gadevari St Business, R/o Flat No.FF-2, 1 Street, Powerpet, Eluru, West Godavari District. 3. Karpuram Venkata Prasada Rao, S/o Seshagiri Rao, Aged 42 years. Floor, Venkatarama Towers, rd Occ: Business, Rio Flat No.TF-5, 3 Gadevari Street, Powerpet, Eluru, West Godavari District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The Chairman and Managing Director, A.P.E.P.D.C.L., Corporate P & T Colony, Near Gurudwar, Seethammadhara, Office, Visakhapatnam, A.P. 2. The Superintending Engineer, A.P.E.P.D.C.L., Beside Fly Over, Near Gow Samrakshana, Vidyut Bhavan, R.R. Peta, Eluru, West Godavari District, A.P. 3. The Divisional Engineer, Operations, APEPDCL, Beside Fly Over, Near Gow Samrakshana, Vidyut Bhavan, R.R. Petal Eluru, West Godavari District. 4. The Assistant Engineer, Operations, APEPDCL, Eluru Town, Powerpet, Eluru, West Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents, particularly, the Respondent No.4 in issuing the notice of disconnection vide Letter No. AE/Opn/Powerpeta/F./D.No.360/15 dated 24- 4-2015 threatening to disconnect electricity service connection Nos. 72064, 72148 and 72147 of the petitioners is illegal, capricious, arbitrary, violative of Article 14, 21 of Constitution of India, against the provisions of Electricity Act and violative of terms and conditions of electricity service connections and consequently direct the respondents not to disconnect the petitioners service connections for no fault of them f A Mn- 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 30547 OF 201 fi) nder Section 151 CPC praying stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to disconnect the service connection bearing Nos. 72064, 72148 and 72147 of the petitioners, pending disposal of the main writ petition Petitior 4.U II lai le circumstances I I LI Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents : M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) The Court made the following: : SRI. B PRAKASAM APHC010437792015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) iP [3331] MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23574/2015 Between; Smt. Gorji Rama and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Chairman And Managing Director and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): ...RESPONDENT(S) 1. B PRAKASAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Impugning the notice issued by respondent No.4 dated 24.04.2015, the above writ petition is filed. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri Gyary Nethali, learned counsel representing Sri B. Prakasam, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that by efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous. 2. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI B PRAKASAM Advocate 2. One CC to SRI M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL) 3. Three CD Copies Ksr (gsg) [OPUC] Advocate [OPUC] HIGH COURT \, . 'V DATED:05/05/2025 V_/l \L^ER % WP.No.23574 of 2015 Current c>eciion .09/. .a-y' DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS AS INFRUCTUOUS