[2025:RJ-JP:43601] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9605/2025 1. Omeshwar Sepat S/o Thanaram Sepat, R/o Sepatpura Dhawli, Amarsar, Jaipur Gramin Raj. 2. Thanaram Sepat S/o Late Mahadev Prasad, R/o Sepatpura Dhawli, Amarsar, Jaipur Gramin Raj. 3. Bidam Devi W/o Thanaram Sepat, R/o Sepatpura Dhawli, Amarsar, Jaipur Gramin Raj. 4. Sourabh Sepat W/o Nikhil, R/o Ranipura Ghanota, Govindgarh, Jaipur Gramin Raj. ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Anirudh Singh Rathore, Adv.for Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 30/10/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 204/2025 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Jaipur City (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 341, 313 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that the present is a matrimonial dispute and entire family members has been implicated in the matter. It is submitted that the marriage was solemnized in the year 2012 and out of wedlock, [2025:RJ-JP:43601] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9605/2025] a child was born. It is submitted that on account of adultery, FIR has been lodged at a belated stage. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. It is submitted by counsel for the complainant that abortions were carried out in the year 2018, howsoever, he admits that no complaint was ever filed in this regard. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the applicant; the fact that the matter is matrimonial in nature; that the marriage was solemnized in the year 2012; that there is no domestic violence complaint has been filed and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record, this Court deems it appropriate to allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Mahila Thana, Jaipur City (West) in F.I.R. No. 204/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants- Omeshwar Sepat S/o Thanaram Sepat, Thanaram Sepat S/o Late Mahadev Prasad, Bidam Devi W/o Thanaram Sepat and Sourabh Sepat W/o Nikhil, they shall be released on bail, provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; and if the applicant fails to join and [2025:RJ-JP:43601] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9605/2025] render due cooperation in the investigation or does not mark appearance before the concerned authority, as directed hereinabove, the present order allowing anticipatory bail to the applicant shall cease to operate; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /170