Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49502 (AP)

Smt. Gadidesi Sandhya v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8237/2020 · 2025-09-22

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010137392020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8237/2020 Between: 1. SMT. GADIDESI SANDHYA, , W/O. RAVI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. PEDAPATNAM VILLAGE, MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY- REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, , BANDAR MANDAL, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. MANDAPATI RAJU, , S/O. LATE YESUPADAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. PEDAPATNAM VILLAGE, MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. MANDAPATI SOMAIAH, S/O. LATE YESUPADAM, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. PEDAPATNAM VILLAGE, MACHILIPATNAM MANDAL. KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.8237 of 2020 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, the action of the respondents in trying to convert the prawn tanks inan extent of Ac. 1.90 cents in R.S.No. 133-A of pedapatnam village, Machilipatnam Mandal, Krishna District into house sites and distribute the same under the governmentschedule ofNavaratnalu- pedalandariki illu programme depriving the ingressand eggress to me as illegal and arbitrary and violation of article 14, 21 and 300-A of constitution of India and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grantinterim direction directing the respondents not to interfere with prawn crop activities being conducted in the prawn tanks by the petitioner in an extent of Ac. 1.90 cents in R.S.No. 133-A of Pedapatnam village, Machilipatnam Mandal, Krishna District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.8237 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in trying to convert the prawn tanks in an extent of Ac.1.90 cents in R.S.No.133-A of Pedapatnam village, Machilipatnam Mandal, Krishna District into house sites and distribute the same under the government scheme of <Navaratnalu – Pedalandariki Illu= programme depriving the ingress and egress to the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 submits that the respondent authorities concerned will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land, if not already used by now for the above said public purpose of housing scheme, strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose, by giving due opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, including the petitioner and the un-official respondents and upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible. 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.8237 of 2020 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN Dt: 23.09.2025 sj 5 HBKM,J W.P.No.8237 of 2020 573 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 8237 of 2020 Dt: 23.09.2025 sj