MOHD. IPHATKHAR AHMAD ANSARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/329/2019 · 2025-03-20
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4950 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4950 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:41838 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 329 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mohd. Iphatkhar Ahmad Ansari And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Arun Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C.,Manu Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. The petitioner before this Court has able to point out that concerned respondent has passed two contrary orders one dated 03.11.2018, whereby appointment of petitioners were considered to be valid whereas subsequent order passed within a week thereafter i.e. on 12.11.2018, wherein appointment of petitioners considered to be de hors without taking note of earlier order. Both orders were passed by same concerned respondent. Sri Sanjay Vikram Singh, learned counsel for petitioner submits that order dated 0311.2018 was placed for the first time before this Court by way of supplementary affidavit filed on 23.08.2024, therefore at this stage has no specific instruction, however, he fairly submits that in the light of above two contrary orders, the matter may be remitted to concerned respondent. Sri Ashish Kumar Nagvanshi, learned A.C.S.C. for State has no objection if such prayer is allowed. In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that matter is remitted to concerned respondent to pass fresh order after taking note of above referred
order dated 0311.2018 also within a very short period.
Order Date :- 21.3.2025 P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad