Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49495 (AP)

Donthineni Rathnakara Rao, v. S. SATYANARAYANA IAS

CC/3115/2025 · 2025-12-02

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010564662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3115 OF 2025 Between: 1. Donthineni Rathnakara Rao,, S/o. Sivarama Krishnaiah, aged 53 years. R/o. H. No. 2-70 C, Appapuram Village, Kakumanu Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. S SATYANARAYANA IAS, Presently working as Special Chief Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, BC Welfare Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. Sri Peeyush Kumar IAS, Presently working as Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Finance and Planning Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 3. Sri G Bhima Sankar Rao, Managing Director (FAC), Economically Backward Classes Welfare Department, 2nd Floor, Sri Vishnu Towers, Krishnaveni School Road Poranki, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for their willful disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 14.08.2025 passed in W.P. No. 32921 of 2023. SRK, J CC No.3115 of 2025 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Respondents: U KANAKA RAJU Counsel for the Respondents: SRK, J CC No.3115 of 2025 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 14.08.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.32921 of 2023. 2. Today, when the matter came up for admission, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, no further orders are necessary to be passed in this Contempt Case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:03.12.2025 Nsr SRK, J CC No.3115 of 2025 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Contempt Case No.3115 of 2025 Date:03.12.2025 Nsr