Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49483 (RAJ)

SURAJ S/O KANARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13285/2025 · 2025-11-27

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48138] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13285/2025 Suraj S/o Kanaram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ajmera Ki Dhani Mazola Ka Rasta Dungrikala, Police Station Malpura, Distt. Tonk (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Wahid Naqvi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 27/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No.352/2024 registered at Police Station Sarwar District Kekri for the offence(s) under Section 303(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicant is a young man, aged about 30 years and he has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is submitted that he is behind the bars ever since 09.07.2025. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the applicant is having twenty criminal antecedents. 4. The criminal antecedents of the accused-applicant are reproduced herein below: [2025:RJ-JP:48138] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13285/2025] Seria l No. FIR No. Sections Challan No. Police Station Result 1. 147/2009 29.08.09 4/6 of RNC Act 91/09 31.08.09 Malpura,Tonk 2. 142/2010 25.08.10 136 of Electricity Act 120/10 29.11.10 Malpura, Tonk 3. 27/2010 13.02.10 136 Electricity Act 185/10 31.10.10 Todaraisingh, Tonk 4. 40/2010 04.03.10 136 Electricity Act 226/10 30.11.10 Todaraisingh, Tonk 5. 250/2010 15.08.10 136 Electricity Act 212/10 29.11.10 Todaraisingh, Tonk 6. 31/2010 18.02.10 136 Electricity Act 225/10 30.11.10 Todaraisingh, Tonk 7. 34/2010 19.02.10 136 Electricity Act 211/10 29.11.10 Todaraisingh, Tonk 8. 221/2010 16.08.10 136 Electricity Act 214/10 29.11.10 Todaraisingh, Tonk 9. 264/2010 26.09.10 136 Electricity Act 213/10 29.11.10 Todaraisingh, Tonk 10. 193/2010 22.07.10 136 Electricity Act 218/10 30.11.10 Todaraisingh, Tonk 11. 194/2011 14.07.11 302, 396, 412 of IPC 162/11 27.09.11 Todaraisingh, Tonk 12. 110/2011 09.04.11 457, 380 IPC 201/11 02.11.11 Muhana, Jaipur 13. 220/2011 05.07.11 457, 380 IPC 202/11 02.11.11 Muhana, Jaipur 14. 142/2012 16.04.12 460, 302, 395 IPC 216/12 31.07.12 Chaksu, Jaipur 15. 105/2013 07.06.13 457, 380 IPC 69/13 17.06.13 Diggi, Tonk 16. 130/2013 12.04.13 380 IPC 112/13 30.06.13 Devli, Tonk 17. 76/2019 09.06.19 457, 380 IPC 94/19 31.10.19 Pachewar, Tonk 18. 319/2022 10.12.22 419, 420, 465, 120 IPC 02/13 29.01.23 Malpura, Tonk 19. 320/2023 17.10.23 3/25 Arms Act 86/24 27.05.24 Malpura, Tonk 20 106/2024 27.04.24 341, 323, 504 IPC 104/24 21.06.24 Malpura, Tonk 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that there is twenty criminal antecedents pending against the applicant and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without [2025:RJ-JP:48138] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13285/2025] commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /87