APHC010063262021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3845/2021 Between: 1. MARKAPURAM MURALIKRISHNA,, S/O LATE. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 44YEARS, D.NO. 2/247, BALAJI NAGAR, KADAPA CITY,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA CITY,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADAPA I TOWN POLICE STATION, KADAPA CITY,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. CHENNAM SHETTY MURALIKRISHNA, S/O KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, PROPERIETER OF RADHIKA SHOPPING MALL, D.NO. 14/600,GOPALA SWAMY STREET, KADAPA CITY,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. MOPURI VENKATA RAMIREDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 45YEARS, D.NO. 1/436-3-1-1,MARUTI NAGAR, KADAPA CITY,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. T VITTAL PRASAD, ,S/O VENKATA KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D.NO. 14/176, SANGAMPETA, KADAPA CITY,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. V MURALIDHAR, S/O SUBBACHARY, AGED ABOUT 43YEARS, D.NO. 7/360,BHAGYA NAGAR COLONY, KADAPA CITY,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order or orders more particularly one in particularly in the nature of wirt of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not conduting the investigating in connection with crime/FIR no. 11/2021 dated 12.01.2021 as illegal arbitrary violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of code of criminal procedure and consequenctly direct the 3'1 respondent to conduct the investigation forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the investigation and arrest the accused persons/unofficial respondents i.e, respondent no. 4 to 7 pending diposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3845/2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a writ or order or orders more particularly one in particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not conducting the investigating in connection with crime/FIR no.11/2021 dated 12.01.2021 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and also contrary to the provisions of code of criminal procedure and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to conduct the investigation forthwith…= 2. Heard Sri P.Narasimhulu, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, would submit that investigation is completed in this matter and that the matter is referred as civil in nature. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025 JLV 189 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.3845 of 2025 Dated: 22.09.2025 JLV