IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY. THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 1613 OF 2020 Between: 1. Smt.D. Venkata Lakshmamma, W/o Siranna, Agriculture. 2. Smt.D.Hussainamma, W/o Devaraj 3. D.Srinivasulu, S/o Late George, (son of Smt. D. Marthamma) age 65 years. Occ. Agriculture. 4. Smt.P.Salamma, W/o Yella Subbadu. Age 60 years. Occ. Agriculture. 5. Smt. Lavanya, W/o Bhavani Sankar. A.ge 35 years. Occ. Agricultrue. All are R/o Vempenta Village. Pamulapadu Mandal. Kurnool District. ...PETITIONER(S) age 50 years. Occ. age 59 years. Occ. Agriculture. u AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh. Rep.by its Principal Secretary. Irrigation Department. Secretariat. Velagapudi. Amaravathi. Guntur District. 2. The District Collector. Kurnool District at Kurnool. 3. The Executive Engineer. K.C.Canal Division. Nandyala Town. Kurnool District. 4. The Deputy Executive Engineer. K.C.Canal Division. Nandyal Town Kurnool District. 5. The Tahsildar. Pamulapadu Mandal. Kurnool District ...RESPONDENTS of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution may i be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or direction more particularly one declaring the action of the respondents in acquiring the petitioners' lands totally an extent of Ac.14-00 Cents, in Sy .No.358/A, situated at Vempenta Village, Pamulapad Kurnool District, without paying the compensation under Act. 2013 I' //J u Mandal, the Land Acquisition were paid the f ■ r I*---' I par with similarly situated persons, who on : • ?'■ compensation for very same purposes and notification, contrary to settled principles of law and violative of principles of natural justice apart from violative of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution against the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and respondents to pay the compensation to the as illegal, arbitrary. of India and consequently .direct the petitioners for acquiring their lands totally an extent of Ac.14-00 Cents, in Sy.No.358/A, situated at Vempenta Village, Pamulapadu Mandal, Kurnool District respectively. lA NO: 1 OF 2070 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the compensation forthwith to the petitioners for acquiring their lands totally an extent of Ac.14-00 Cents Sy.No.358/A, situated at Vempenta Village, Pamulapadu District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. in Mandal, Kurnool Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI P VENGALA REDDY SRI FRANCIS VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1,3,4: GP FOR IRRIGATION Counsel for the Respondents No.2,5: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following; ORDER -f APHC010024962020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3468] i TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 1613/2020 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) Smt.d. Venkata Lakshmamma, and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petltioner(S): 1.P VENGALA REDDY 2. FRANCIS VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2.GP FOR IRRI ANDCAD (AP) 3* The Court made the following On 30.01.2020, when the order: matter was listed for the first time, there was . and the matter was directed to be 2024, after a long gap of time, counsel for the petitioners submitted no representation for the petitioners, in the usual course. On 10.12. listed the matter was listed, and the learned his arguments. Upon his request, the Accordingly, on 20.12.2024, the matter was adjourned to 20.12.2024 for continuation, matter was listed. However, the learned an adjournment to list the counsel for the petitioners sought Sankranti vacation. The date. case after the matter was then adjourned to 21.01.2025 On the said the learned counsel for once again, adjournment, and the 28.01.2025, the learned the petitioners sought matter was adjourned to 28.01.2025. an Again, on counsel for the petitioners sought and the matter was directed to be listed listed on 18.02.2025, an adjournment, on 18.02.2025. When the matter was once again under the learned counsel for the petitioners sought an adjournment. Thereafter, the caption for dismissal on 25.02.2025 the matter was directed to be listed 2. Today, when the matter i IS listed under the caption for dismissal. there is no representation for the petitioners. 3. In view of the above, this Writ Petition i There shall be no order as to costs. IS dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. Sd/-SHAIK MOHD RAF[ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE N OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. P. VENGALA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR IRRIGATION, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three C.D.Copies [OUT] nm HIGH COURT DATED;25/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.1613 of 2020 0 5 JUL m CO DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS