Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49475 (RAJ)

HITESH UJJWAL S/O CHITTARMAL v. MOHAN LAL S/O KALURAM

CRLMP/6329/2025 · 2025-11-19

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6329/2025 1. Hitesh Ujjwal S/o Chittarmal, R/o Pachear, District Tonk, Presently Resident Of Jen, Gss-Guradi, Police Station, Manoharthana, District Jhalawar 2. Ashish Kumar S/o Satish, Resident D.c.m. Kota Presently Technical Assistant Gss Manoharthana, Thana Manoharthana, District Jhalawar (Raj.) 3. Vinod Sahu S/o Balchand Sahu, Resident Ghehukhedi, Thana Aklera, Presently Assistant Gss, Manoharthana, Thana Manoharthana. 4. Mayank Bhargava S/o Harimohan, Resident Bihar Colony Near Kachari Datiya, Thana-Datiya (Mp) Presently Jen, Manoharthana, Thana Manoharthana 5. Patel Narayan S/o Kandorbhai, Resident Thana Jaabhoi, District Jhawarkota Gujrat, Presently Technical Assistant Gss Manoharthana, Thana Manoharthana. 6. Jyotish S/o Shiv Charan, Resident Behbaadi, Thana Shahpura, District Betul M.p. Presently Technical Assistant, Manoharthana, Thana Manoharthana, District Jhalawar (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Mohan Lal S/o Kaluram, R/o Jalampura, Thana- Dhaangipura, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan) 2. Lalchand S/o Bhanwarlal, R/o Jalampura, Thana- Dhaangipura, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sarvesh Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 19/11/2025 (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6329/2025] 1. By way of filing this petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 05.04.2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manoharthana (Jhalawar), by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioners under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 427, 504 and 506 IPC. 2. Admittedly, the aforesaid order is final and the same is revisable under Section 397 Cr.P.C/438 BNSS 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, revision petition is maintainable before the Court of Sessions, but without invoking the said provision, the petitioners have straightaway approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. 4. On this count alone, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court of Sessions by way of filing revision petition. 5. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/25