1 2025:CGHC:54334 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12619 of 2025 • Dr. Anju Sharma W/o Dr. Sumanta De Aged About 42 Years R/o Near Mahaveer Park Colony, Near Housing Board Society Housing Society Board Mahasamund District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary Department Of Agriculture Development And Farmer Welfare And Biotechnology, Ground Floor, Block-3, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Pin – 492001. 2. The Director, Directorate Of Veterinary Science, Livestock, Development, Department Ground Floor, Block- No.03, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Pin Code – 492002. 3. The Under Secretary Chhattisgarh, Livestock Development Department 4th Floor, Block-B, Indravati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. Anmol Sharma, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 07/11/2025 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief(s), as under:- (a) A writ and / or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue directing call for the relevant records relating to the petitioner’s case for its kind perusal. DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 (b) A writ and / or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue quashing the impugned transfer order 30.06.2025 (Anneuxre-P/2) and order dated 08.08.2025 (Annexure-P/1) whereby the representation may be rejected by the Transfer Committee without assigning any reason. (c) A writ and / or an order in the nature of appropriate writ do issue allowing the petitioner to discharge the duties as Assistant Veterinary Officer in the Veterinary Hospital, Jhalap, District Mahasamund, in its entirety, in the facts and circumstances of the case. (d) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case. (e) Cost fo the petition may also be awarded. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that representation of the petitioner has been decided without obtaining the opinion of the department, therefore, she seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh representation before the concerned authorities. 3. State counsel has no objection with regard to the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. In view of above, this petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge