Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH OF ANDHRA PRADESH:;AIVIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) thirtieth day of JANUARY cf TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE present ' THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 2177 OF 9n^i; Between: Village, Pendurthi Mandal,'vIsakhapatnarDfefrS Revenue ...Petitioner AND '■ Go:emmen°'Home^Lp^rtml!?f fy. Principal Secretary . Guntur District. ^ rtment, Secretariat. Velagapudi, Amaravati to
2. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam • 9®P^*T Superintendent District. 4. The P.L.C.F. (Pre-Litigation v-^ommissioner of Police District. 5. The Inspector of Police, Pendurthi District. District, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam of Police, Pendurthi r^n^r°T?-' Office of the Central Complaint Cell, Visakhapatnam Pendurthi Mandal,. Visakhapatnam
6. The Station House Officer, Pendurthi Mandal
7. The Revenue Divisional Officer . Visakhapatnam District. Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam District. 8. The Thasildar, Pendurthi Mandal Visakhapatnam 5“6-f-2?S'a'ranc/;^ara“"™ Swamy Aged District _ about -65 years R/o D No puram , Visakhapatnam Pin 53008 GavarrKanc1iarlp°alemt^'2!fha^p®am 1^00^ ” l"2^^^SSe^ar^p^rer^^^^^^ Vears, D/No 56-
Malleswara Rao Aged about 43-10-130 Ramurthipanthulapeta Visakahapatnam
14. P.Shanthi, D/o Suryanarayana Aged about 68 years R/o D Nn 14 in Ramajogipeta Visakahapatnam pin 53002 14-38-10 N.Suryanarayana Aged 65 years R/o D No 18-19. Kummaraveedi.Maharanipeta Visakhapatnam Pin 530002 ^.^t'^yavathi, w/o Kondal Rao Aged about 72 years D no 13 2-4 Chandrakayeedi .Maharanipeta,Visakahapatnam 68 years, D.NO - ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders may one more particularly in the action of the Respondent 9 and 16 in interfering with Ciyil Station pertaining to land of the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare Nos.2 to 8 in collusion with Respondent Nos. dispute and calling the petitioner to the Police the petitioner of an extent of Ac. 1.04 cents in Sy. No.371/10 situated in Sathiyani Palem hamlet of Narya Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District while the matter is pending in O.S. No.437/2022 and O.S.NO 438/2022 and 439/2 022 and 440/2022 on the file of the Principle Junior Civil Judge, Bhimali and A.S. No.401 of 2019 on the file of District Judge Visakhapatnam, is illegal, arbitrary and violation of articles and 300-A of the Constitution
14.
19 (1), 21 of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 6 not to interfere in Ciyil disputes and call the petitioner to the Police Station pertaining to land of an extent of Ac 1 40 cents in Sy.No.371/10 situated in Sathiyanipalem, hamlet of Naraya Village Madhurawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District while the matter is pending in O.S. No. O.S. NO.437/2022 and O.S.NO 438/2022 and 439/2022 and 440/2022 on the file of the Principle Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam, and A.S. No.401 of 2019 on the file of District Judge, Visakhapatnam, in the interest of justice
s.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, particularly the Respondent Nos.2 to 7, not to interfere in Civil disputes pertaining to land of an extent of Ac. 1.40 cents in Sy.No.371/10 situated in Sathivanipalem, hamlet of Narava Village, Madhurawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District while matter is pending in in O.S. N0.437/2022& O.S.NO 438/2022&439/2022 &440/2022 on the file of the Principle Junior Civil Judge, Bhimali and A.S. No.401 of 2019 on the file of District Judge, Visakhapatnam Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.7 and 8: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.9 to 16: None The Court made the following: Order
1 APHC010039672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA PFTlTinN NO: 2177/2025 [3333] Between; Maravathu Madhusudhana Rao ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The State of A.P. and others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
2
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent Nos.2 to 8 in collusion with Respondent Nos.9 and 16 in interfering with Civil dispute and calling the petitioner to the Police Station pertaining to land of the petitioner of an extent of Ac-1.04 cents in Sy.No.371/10 situated in Sathivani Palem hamlet of Narva Village, Pendurthi Mandal, VIsakhapatnam District while the matter is pending in O.S.No.437/2022 and O.S.No.438/2022 and 439/2022 and 440/2022 on the file of the Principle Junior Civil Judge, Bhimali and A.S.No.401 of 2019 on the file of District Judge, VIsakhapatnam is illegal, arbitrary and violation of articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 6 not to Interfere in Civil disputes and call the petitioner to the Police Station pertaining to land of an extent of Ac-1.40 cents in Sy.No.371/10 situated in Sathivanipalem ,hamlet of Narava Village, Madhurawada Mandal, VIsakhapatnam District while the matter is pending in O.S.No.437/2022 and O.S.No.438/2022 and 439/2022 and 440/2022 on the file of the Principle Junior Civil Judge, VIsakhapatnam and A. S.No. 401 of 2019 on the file of District Judge, VIsakhapatnam ’’ \ Heard the
learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government
2. Pleaders for Home and Revenue appearing for respondents. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned Public Prosecutor furnished a copy of instructions of the Station House Officer, Pendurthi Police Station, Visakhapatnam City, dated 29.01.2025, wherein it is stated that the petitioner has already filed a writ petition with regard to the land to an extent of Ac-1.04 cents in Sy.No.371/10 situated in Sathivanipalem hamlet of Narva Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and that the police have never interfered in the civil dispute between the petitioner and unofficial
3. respondents herein.
IP 3 Recording the above instructions, the Writ Petition is
disposed of directing respondents No.2 to 8 not to interfere into the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents No.9 to 16, until and unless there is a specific direction from the competent civil court to do so. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
4.
5. closed.
//TRUE COPY// To » SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam District.
4. The P.L.C.F. (Pre-Litigation Council Forum), C/o Office of the Commissioner of Police, Central Complaint Cell, Visakhapatnam District.
5. The Inspector of Police, Pendurthi, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
6. The Station House Officer, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District.
7. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam District.
8. The Thasildar, Pendurthi Mandal Visakhapatnam District
9. One CC to SRI BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO Advocate [OPUC]
10. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
11. Two CCs toGP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
12. Three CD Copies gsg ■■
HIGH COURT DATED: 30/01/2025
ORDER WP.No.2177 of 2025 o ^OFANOj^ I 12 FEB 2C25. ^ ★ Current Section . ^ DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS