Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46699] (1 of 3) [CW-14816/2025] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14816/2025 Naman Medical Store, Through Proprietor Cum Authorized Signatory Dr. Sunil Tanvar, Address Jaipur Doorbin Hospital 78, 8 Devi Nagar Mod Metro Pillar No-79, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Police Directorate, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. The Commissioner Of Police, Cyber Crime Cell Police Commissionerate, Khasa Kothi, M. I Road Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. The Inspector Of Police, Cyber Crime Police Station, Central Crime Branch Vepery, Chennai Tamil Nadu.
4. Branch Manager/ Nodal Officer, Hdfc Bank, Address Vivek Vihar, New Sanganer Road Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naman Yadav, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order 19/11/2025
1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“ (1) Issue a rate in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate grid, order or direction commanding the respondent bank to immediately unfreeze the account of
the
petitioner
bearing
account
number 50200081499651 held with HDFC Bank Address Vivek Vihar, New Sanganer Road Jaipur (Raj.) (2) Direct the respondent Bank to provide written reasons of freezing the account and any communication received from cyber crime authorities, if any. (3) Declare the action of the respondent Bank is arbitrary, illegal violation of Articles 14, 19(1) (g) and 300A of the Constitution of India.
[2025:RJ-JP:46699] (2 of 3) [CW-14816/2025] (4) Award costs of this petition in favour of the petitioner. (5) Pause such further or other orders as may be deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not misused his bank account for the purpose of illegal transaction and he has not committed any Cyber Crime.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigating agency. He, therefore, prays that the disputed amount, which has been received in the petitioner’s bank account No.50200081499651 in HDFC Bank, Branch Vivek Vihar, Jaipur may be withheld and he may be allowed to operate the bank account, he is facing problem in day to day money transaction.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the
arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. In view of the submissions made before this Court, the direction is issued to the respondent-bank to de-freeze the saving account No.50200081499651 in HDFC Bank, Branch Vivek Vihar, Jaipur. However, the disputed amount i.e. Rs.3300/- or any other amount as intimated by the investigation agency, which has been credited in the petitioner’s account in connection with fraudulent transactions shall remain freezed. It is further made clear that keeping the disputed amount aside the petitioner will be allowed to operate his aforementioned savings account for day to day money transactions. It is further directed that only the disputed amount i.e. Rs.3300/- or any other amount as intimated by the investigation agency, which has been alleged to have been credited in the petitioner’s account shall be freezed in the account of the petitioner and he will be allowed to operate his account.
[2025:RJ-JP:46699] (3 of 3) [CW-14816/2025]
6. It is made clear that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigating officer and he will appear before investigating agency as and when required. It is also ordered that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue his above mentioned bank account with the respondent- bank till the investigation is completed by the investigating agency. It is also made clear that in case, after the investigation, the involvement of the petitioner is found in any illegal transaction, the investigating agency would be free to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of.
8. Stay application and other application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J AVINASH GULERIA /131