Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49461 (CHH)

SMT. SHEERMANI v. SURPAL SINGH

MAC/308/2023 · 2025-12-12

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:60802 NAFR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Judge- Lok Adalat : Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Member - Lok Adalat : Shri Sunil Otwani, Senior Advocate MAC No. 308 of 2023 1 - Smt. Sheermani Wd/o Late Ganpat Bharti Aged About 20 Years R/o Dongripara, Village Paikpal, Village Panchayat Ulnaar, P.S. Nagarnar, District Bastar Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Tulsa Bharti Wd/o Late Raghunath Bharti, Aged About 43 Years R/o Dongripara, Village Paikpal, Village Panchayat Ulnaar, P.S. Nagarnar, District Bastar Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ku. Rukmani Bharti D/o Late Raghunath Bharti Aged About 18 Years R/o Dongripara, Village Paikpal, Village Panchayat Ulnaar, P.S. Nagarnar, District Bastar Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants versus 1 - Surpal Singh S/o Vishnu Bahadur Singh Through Balram Pal S/o Chandrika Prasad Pal, R/o Sanjay Gandhi Ward, Near Ram Mandir, Jagdalpur P.S. Bodhghat, District Bastar Chhattisgarh. (Driver) 2 - Balram Pal S/o Chandrika Prasad Pal, R/o Sanjay Gandhi Ward, Near Ram Mandir, Jagdalpur P.S. Bodhghat, District Bastar Chhattisgarh. (Owner) 3 - Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Branch Manager, Branch Office E-8, Rikko Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur (Rajasthan) (Insurance Co.) ---- Respondents 2 For Appellants : Shri Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Shri Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate AWARD (Passed on 13.12.2025) 1. The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably settled/compromised the dispute, which is subject matter of this appeal, voluntarily. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal. There is no legal impediment to compromise and hence are acceptable. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement, proposed by the parties and order that the Respondent No.3/Insurance Company shall pay Rs.1,25,000/- by way of compensation in addition to the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal to the appellant within 60 days from today. In case the amount is not paid within stipulated time then the interest @ 6% per annum from the date of passing of this compromise award shall also be payable till its realization. 2. Copy of this award should be provided free of cost to the parties immediately. All other terms and conditions, if any, shall remain same as per the order passed by the Tribunal. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Sunil Otwani) Judge -Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur Vasant