Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49459 (AP)

POCHIRAJU VEERA VENKATA SATYA TRINADHA SAI SESHAGIRIRAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/8202/2025 · 2025-11-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010405932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 8202/2025 Between: POCHIRAJU VEERA VENKATA SATYA TRINADHA SAI SESHAGIRIRAO, S/O. APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O. 7-90, NEAR PANCHAYT OFFICE, INDRAPALEM, KAKINADA KAKINADA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI 2. GABU SRINIVASAREDDY, S/O. APPALAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O.DURGANAGAR COLONY, GUDARIGUNTA ROAD, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. RAJU GUBBALA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed, by the Petitioner/Accused, seeking to quash the Order dated 01.07.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2884 of 2025 in C.C.No.938 of 2020 on the file of the Court of III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum-III Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kakinada and consequently to pass orders for 2 sending Exs.P.1 and P.5 to the Hand Writing Expert along with the admitted signatures of the Petitioner. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Raju Gubbala, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, to prove the case of the Petitioner, it is essential to send Exs.P.1 and P.5 to the Hand Writing Expert for comparison with his admitted signatures. 3. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to raise his contentions before the trial Court in C.C.No.938 of 2020. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.11.2024 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.8202 of 2025 Dt.19.11.2025 Dinesh