APHC010711972011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22794/2011 Between: 1. KILANA APPARAO,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT & 20 OTHERS, S/O.LATE NARAYANA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 2. PATHIVADA GOVINDA RAO, S/O.LATE PRAKASARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 3. SMT.PATHIVADA NARAYANAMMA, W/O.GOVINDARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. BALAGA VENKATARAMANA, S/O.LATE DALAPPANNA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 5. KILLANA SRINIVASARAO, S/O.LATE LACHUMAYYA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 6. KILLANA SUBHAKIRTHI, S/O.LATE LACHUMAYYA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 7. SMT.BANTUPALLI CHINNAMMA, W/O.LATE ENDU CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 8. PATHIVADA APPALANAIDU, S/O.LATE PRAKASARAO 2 JS,J W.P.No.22794/2011 CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 9. SMT.PATHIVADA INDIRA, W/O.APPALA NAIDU CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 10. PATHIVADA SATEESH, S/O.APPALA NAIDU CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 11. CHIMMARI VENKATA RAMANA, S/O.LATE MOHANARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 12. CHIMMARI GOVINDARAO, S/O.LATE SUBBAIAH CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 13. BARRI GOVINDARAO, S/O.NARAYANARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 14. BARRI NARAYANA RAO, S/O.LATE APPALA NARASIMHULU CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 15. BARRI RAJYALAKSHMI, D/O.NARAYANARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 16. SMT.BARRI VAZRALAMMA, W/O.NARAYANARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 17. SOMIREDDY DEENABANDHU NAIDU, S/O.LATE DHARMARAO CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 18. PONDURU APPARAO, S/O.GURAYYA CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 19. GULU VINDALA GANESH, S/O.LATE NAGABHUSHAN 3 JS,J W.P.No.22794/2011 CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 20. SMT.GULUVINDALA DRAKASHAYAMI, W/O.LATE NAGABHUSHAN CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 21. PADALA LAXMI NARAYANA, S/O.PADALA APPALA SWAMI CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASANKILI VILLAGE HERAMANDALAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI VISAKHA GRAMEENA BNAK KORADA BRANCH 2 OTHERS, KORADA BRANCH,REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 2. THE GOVT OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI 3. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REP BY ITS GOVERNOR, MUMBAI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandmaus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in deducting the amounts from the agricultural loan accounts of the petitioner which was remitted by way of cheques by the Land Acquisition officer, is illegal, arbitrary,and against the principles of natural justice consequently directing the 1st respondent to remit back the deducted amounts along with the interest from the date of deduction of amounts to the date of actual relaization and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 27863 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to remit back the principal amounts including deducted amounts which were deducted from the accounts of the petitioners pending disposal of main writ petition and pass 4 JS,J W.P.No.22794/2011 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAJA GOPALA RAO HANUMANTHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. V UMA DEVI The Court made the following ORDER: Though the matter was adjourned on 09.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 25.11.2025. Even on that day there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption <for dismissal=. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested to prosecute the case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.12.2025 KAS 5 JS,J W.P.No.22794/2011 219 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22794/2011 Dated: 02.12.2025 KAS