Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4945 (KAR)

SMT.MAHADEVI v. SHRI.ANIL RAMACHANDRAN KAMBLE,

MFA/100993/2016 · 2025-03-05

Umesh M Adiga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4247 MFA No. 100993 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100993 OF 2016 (WC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MAHADEVI W/D/O. MANJNATH PATIL, AGE 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD, R/O. 3112, KHADE BAZAR, BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI. 2. KUMARI POOJA D/O. MANJUNATH PATIL, AGE 22 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. 3112, KHADE BAZAR, BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI. 3. KUMARI NANDINI D/O. MANJUNATH PATIL, AGE 22 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. 3112, KHADE BAZAR, BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI. 4. KUMARI GAYATRI D/O. MANJUNANTH PATIL, AGE 17 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. 3112, KHADE BAZAR, BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4247 MFA No. 100993 of 2016 (BEING MINOR REPRESENTED THROUGH HER MOTHER I.E. PETITIONER NO.1. …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. GEETHA K. M @ PAWAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI. ANIL RAMACHANDRAN KAMBLE, AGE MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. NAVIN VASHAT CHANDGAD, DISTRICT KOLAPUR. 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 2ND FLOOR, MADIWALE ARCADE, CLUB ROAD, BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S. V. YAJI, ADV. FOR R2; NOTICE TO R1 UNCLAIMED) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.30(1) OF THE EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923, PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE BEFORE THE IIND ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND COMMISSIONER FOR EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION BELAGAVI, IN ECA NO.339/2014 DATED 23-06-2015 AND AWARD COMPENSATION AS CLAIMED BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4247 MFA No. 100993 of 2016 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA) 1. Learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal, which reads as follows: Memo for withdrawal of Appeal The Appellant respectfully submits as follows: 1. That the present appeal has been settled in the Lok Adalat by another counsel, Shri.Hanumanth R. Latur, in MFA No.100902/2017 (Lok Adalat No.256/2020), which was settled on 08.02.2020. 2. In light of the said settlement, the above appeal has become infructuous. 3. Therefore, the Appellant prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to take this Memo on record and dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity. 2. In view of the said memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, as the matter has already been settled between the parties. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4247 MFA No. 100993 of 2016 3. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, the application of I.A.No.1/2016 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the said application in I.A.No.1/2016 is disposed of. Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE RHR / CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13