Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49448 (AP)

Talluri Srinu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/7140/2020 · 2025-12-22

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010112992020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7140/2020 Between: 1. TALLURI SRINU,, S/O. TRIMURTHULU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. SUNKAVILLI RAJU,, S/O. SRIRAMULU, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. BODA ACHARAO,, S/O. NAGAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. K.MAHALAKSHMI,, W/O. NOOKAIAH. AGED 30 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. BODA VENKANNA, , S/O. PENTAIAH, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. KOTA VEERASWAMY, , S/O. NOOKAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 7. BONU YESU,, S/O. KATAIAH, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 8. GARIKAPATI RAMU, , S/O. MURIDAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.7140 of 2020 NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 9. TADEPALLI RAGHAVA, , S/O. SEETAIAH, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 10. BATHINA AMMULU,, W/O. SIMHACHALAM, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 11. JONNADA BULLIAH,, S/O. MARIYYA, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 12. KOTTE SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. DHARMA RAJU, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 13. JAJIMOGGALA SATTIBABU,, S/O. SURYANARAYANA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 14. CHEMMANGI SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. POTHURAJU, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 15. PALIKA NOOKALAMMA, , W/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 16. KOPPU SANYASI RAO,, S/O. RAMULU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 17. GARIKAPATI BULLAIAH,, S/O. RAMUDU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 18. LAVETI NAGESWARA RAO, , S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.7140 of 2020 19. SANNAPU RAGHAVA, , S/O. VENKANNA, AGED 75 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 20. PASUPULETI MARIDIYYA,, S/O. JOGAYYA, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 21. CHANTI BABU,, S/O. BHUVI VEERAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 22. MURARI APPA RAO, , S/O. VEERAIAH, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 23. TADEPALLI CHANTI BABU,, S/O. TADEPALLI BULLI VEERAIAH, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 24. TADEPALLI BHUVI VEERAMMA,, W/O. VEERAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 25. ALLADI APPARAO,, S/O. ALLADI APPA RAO, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O. NAYAKAMPALLY VILLAGE, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AT KAKINADA 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PEDDAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, GANDEPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.7140 of 2020 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in contemplating to dispossess the petitioners herein by without issuing any notice highhandedly and without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary , unjust and violation of Articles 14, 21, 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners herein from the land viz. plot Nos. 110, 34, 134, 20, 135, 157, 164, 84, 112, 14, 59, 144, 116, 117, 119, 162, 114, 55, 63, 113, 121, 120, 65 and 129, all situated in Lay out No.77/1, 82/2A, 2B, situated at Nayakarampally Village, Gandepalli Manda, East Godavari District, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent not to dispossess the petitioners here in from the subject lands viz. plot Nos. plot Nos. 110, 34, 134, 20, 135, 157, 164, 84, 112, 14, 59, 144, 116, 117, 119, 162, 114, 55, 63, 113, 121, 120, 65 and 129, all situated in Lay out No.77/1, 82/2A, 2B, situated at Nayakarampally Village, Gandepalli Manda, East Godavari District, pending disposal in the above writ petition in the interest of justice, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) The Court made the following: 5 HBKM,J W.P.No.7140 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in contemplating to dispossess the petitioners herein, without issuing any notice, highhandedly and without following due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 20.02.2025, submits that alternative government land was identified in Gandepalli village to accommodate the newly identified beneficiaries of Nayakampalli village. The proposed acquisition of vacant plots within the patta lands allotted to the present Writ Petitioners and others in the year 1999 was stopped without any further action. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and upon consideration of the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 20.02.2025 as no cause survives in this matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of as no further orders are necessary in this matter. The written instructions of the 4th respondent shall be made as part of the Court record. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 6 HBKM,J W.P.No.7140 of 2020 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN Dt: 23.12.2025 sj 7 HBKM,J W.P.No.7140 of 2020 36 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO. 7140 of 2020 Dt: 23.12.2025 sj