APHC010431062010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 29830/2010 Between: 1. M/S. VENKATESWARA COLD STORAGE (P) LTD.,, NEAR MIRCHI YARD, SUBBAREDDY NAGAR, GUNTUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI V.SIVA PRASAD S/O. V.VENKATESWARA RAO. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SCOPE MINAR BUILDING, CORE-2, 4TH FLOOR, LAXMINAGAR, NEW DELHI - 110 002. 2. THE REGIONAL P F COMMISSIONER, O/O. SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, PADMAVATHI BUILDINGS, LAXMIPURAM, GUNTUR. 3. THE ASST P F COMMISSIONER, O/O. SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, PADMAVATHI BUILDINGS, LAXMIPURAM, GUNTUR. 4. THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, O/O. SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, PADMAVATHI BUILDINGS, LAXMIPURAM, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of Writ of Certiorari quashing the order passed by the 1st respondent dismissing the appeal ATA No.500 (1)/2003, dtd. 15.9.2010 filed by the petitioner and pass. 2 JS,J W.P.No.29830/2010 IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 38010 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3rd respondent not to take any steps for conducting enquiry for determining the P.F. dues from the petitioner, pending final disposal of the main Writ Petition in this Hon'ble Court and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SUDERSHAN KUMBAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T BALAJI(SC FOR EPFO) 3 JS,J W.P.No.29830/2010 The Court made the following ORDER: Though the matter was adjourned on 02.12.2025 and 09.12.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter is directed to be listed on 16.12.2025. Even on that day there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter is listed today under the caption <for dismissal=. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 23.12.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.29830/2010 161 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 29830/2010 Dated: 23.12.2025 KAS