APHC010013372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 82/2025 Between: 1. SADINENI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O.SADINENI PEDA VENKAIAH AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. 9-221/A, PULIPADUVILLAGE, GURAZALA MANDAL, PALNADU DIST. (BEFORE GUNTUR DISTRICT.) ...PETITIONER AND 1. POLA BHASKAR IAS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, BC WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI BHIM SHANKAR, PRESENTLY WORKING AS DIRECTOR, ECONOMICALLY BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, SRI VISHNU TOWERS, KRISHNAVENI SCHOOL ROAD, PORANKI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SMT S NAGALAKSHMI IAS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EBC AND BC WELFARE WINGS, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SMT K MAYURI, PRESENTLY WORKING AS DISTRICT EEC WELFARE OFFICER, SOCIAL WELFARE COMPLEX,Z.P.OFFICE BACKSIDE,GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 HBKM,J C.C.No.82 of 2025 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, for their willful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 02.05.2024in W.P. No. 5817 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. 3. NIMMAGADDA VIJAYA SANTHI 3 HBKM,J C.C.No.82 of 2025 The Court made the following Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 26.09.2025 PGT