1 2025:CGHC:52956 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5651 of 2025 1 - Narendra Nand S/o Late P. Nand Aged About 63 Years R/o Dewrikhurd, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Magistrate Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsildar Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shiv Singh Thakur Vendor, Revenue Court, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 30 /10/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1. That, the records pertaining to the case of the petitioner may be kindly called for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to render his work as Revenue Petition Writer from the arrangement / office established by petitioner within the premises of Revenue Court Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, in the interest of justice. 10.3. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authorities to remove the disputes 2 /difficulties/blockage arising upon the behest of private respondent against the working of petitioner as Revenue Petition Writer, expeditiously after proving due opportunity of hearing to petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.4. That any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as Revenue Petition Writer in the premises of Office of Tahsildar. He contended that earlier the petitioner was provided the space in the government premises, subsequently he has make arrangements of his own in the same premises for his working, however the petitioner was not permitted to work by the respondent No.5 by making obstruction therein, against which the petitioner has already submitted a representation on 28/11/2024 before the respondent No.4 who is managing the affairs of the premises upon where the petitioner is working however, even after lapse of about 11 months, no action has been taken on his representation, therefore, direction be issued to the Respondent No. 4/ Tahsildar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur to take action and decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/ State would submit that as the petitioner is only seeking a direction to the respondent No.4 to take decision on the representation submitted by him, he is not having any objection to the limited prayer made by the petitioner. He would further submit that if the representation is still pending consideration, it will be considered and decided in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for respective parties, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner herein, this writ petition, at this stage, is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to take decision and appropriate action on the representation submitted by the 3 petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge S.Bhilwar