Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4944 (CAL)

ENAMUL MALITHA v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/106/2025 · 2025-01-10

Gaurang Kanth, Joymalya Bagchi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.01.2025 tkm/ct 28 C.R.M. (A) 106 of 2025 sl no.45 In Re : An application under section 482 of the BNSS 2023 in connection with Tehatta PS case no. 922/2024 dated 17.12.2024 under sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act And In Re : Enamul Malitha …….. petitioner Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee …… for the petitioners Mr. Antarishya Basu Ms. Pallavi Priyadarshee …… for the State 1. Heard learned lawyers for the parties. 2. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner is the owner of the vehicle which was used to transport narcotics. Keeping in mind the aforesaid fact we are of the opinion this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)