IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11547 OF 2025 Between: Bandi Munikumar Reddy, S/o. Band! Sreenivasulu Reddy, R/o. D.No.23-10-71/C, MR Palli, New Maruthi Nagar, Tirupathi Urban, Tirupathi, Tirupathi District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Village, Amaravathi. 2. The Director General of Police, AP Police Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, Amaravathi. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, Tirupathi. 4. The Station House Officer, Tirupathi Rural Police Station, Tirupati. (previously called as MR Palli PS) 5. Palakuru Sowjanya, W/o. Dr.P.L.Jayachandra Reddy, Resident of Kalepalli Village, Erracheruvu Post, Puthalapattu Mandal, Chittoor District. 6. Devireddy Venkata Narayana Reddy, S/o. Devireddy Chalama Reddy, Residing at D.No.1-94B, Jayanagar Colony, Sai Nagar, Avilala Post, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Tirupathi, Tirupathi District ■■ / A 7. Devireddy Geetha, W/o. Devireddy Venkata Narayana Reddy, Residing at D.N0.1-94B, Jayanagar Colony, Sai Nagar, Avilala Post, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Tirupathi, Tirupathi District. ...Respondents ^ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 in summoning the petitioner to the police station without any formal notice or complaint and in coercing to settle the Civil Disputes between the petitioner and the respondent Nos.5,6 and 7 failing which threatening with dire conseguences and implication in false cases is as per se illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of Natural Justice, without power of authority and opposed to the Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and to consequentially direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the Police Station except by following due process as stipulated under law. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in the disputes existing between the petitioner and the 5*^ 6*^ and 7*^ respondents herein with respect to the execution of the Registered Documents bearing Doc. No. 613 of 2025 dated 31/01/2025 and the land conveyed through the pending disposal of the writ petition. same. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Z' The Court made the following order: APHC010220832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY. THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11547/2025 Between: Band! Munikumar Reddy, ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4^'^ respondent is troubling the petitioner at the behest of other respondents Nos.5 to 7 and 2. threatening the petitioner to settle the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the respondent Nos.5 to 7. vV 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader submits on written instructions, that on receipt of a complaint from respondent No.5, the police have called the petitioner to enquire and found that there are civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondent Nos.5 to 7. It is also submitted that the police would not interfere in the civil disputes unless there is a direction from this Court. 4. Considering the submissions, the writ petition is disposed of, making it clear that the 4'*^ respondent shall not interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondent Nos.5 to 7. There shall be costs. no order as to As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K.J. RAJA BABU ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT To, SECTION OFFICER 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home State of Andhra ^ Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Village, Amaravathi. 2. The Director General of Police, Amaravathi. AP Police Head Quarters, Mangalagiri, 3. The Superintendent of Police, Tirupati District, Tirupathi. 4. The Station House Officer, Tirupathi (previously called as MR Palli PS) 5. OneCCto M/s VMR Rural Police Station, Tirupati. Legal Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUTf 7. Three CD Copies GSC T HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 \ ORDER WP.No.11547 of 2025 I 2 3 SEP 2025 m Coi C> Currerii becuon ^ DISPOSING THE WP AT THE STAGE WITHOUT COSTS OF ADMISSION