APHC010406932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8349 OF 2025 Between: 1. Shaik Gousiya, W/o Shaik Karim Proddatur, YSR Kadapa District 2. Shaik Karimulla. S/o Shaik Karim Bash YSR Kadapa Dist Bash, R/o Matti Masjid street, R/o Masjid street, Proddatur ...Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 & 3 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Public Prosecutor, AP, Amaravati High Court of ...Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners/Accused in Crime No.255 of 2025 dated 12.7.2025 of Criminal Petition, the N0.I&3 on bail of SHO, Proddatur I Town P.S., Proddatur. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Gowri Counsel for the Respondent: The Public Prosecutor, The Court made the following order: Sankar Cheekatla. High Court of A.P. APHC010406932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8349/2025 Between: Shaikgousiya and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.GOWRI SANKAR CHEEKATLA 2.Gowri Shankar cheekatia Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 1 2 ORDER: filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the -accused Nos. 1 No. 255 of 2025 of This Criminal Petition has been Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by the petitioners connection with Crime Kadapa District, registered for the Bharatiya and 3 for granting of bail in I Town Police Station, YSR Proddatur alleged offences punishable under Sections 308 (5) read with Section 333, 118 (1). 115 (2), 324 (4) and 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 11-07-2025 at 4.15 p.m., accused criminally trespassed into the house of the de Shaik Habibunnisa who caused damage to household articles and Case of the prosecution is that on Nos. 1 to 6 and some others 2. facto complainant due to non-payment of debt by one is second wife of the complainant ornaments weighing about 150 grams, silver ornaments extorted gold weighing about 500 grams, fridge, television cellphone and two motorcycles de facto complainant, his wife and accused, all the accused beat them with all worth about Rs.10,00,000/-. When the neighbours obstructed the acts of the sticks, hands and caused swelling and pain injuries. Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that offence; they were falsely implicated in conditions to be imposed by this Court; they will not jump any condition as they have fixed abode. Sri Ch.Gowri the petitioners have not committed any 3. this case; they are ready to abide any if any relief is given, and urged to grant bail to the petitioners / 4. Per contra, Ms. P.Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the petitioners investigation is still underway; if the petitioners repeat the same offence and urged to dismiss the bail petition Prosecutor, submitting that the are granted bail, they will 5. Heard and perused the record. 6. The allegation against the petitioners is that they have trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant, put him in fear and extorted 150 grams of gold and 500 grams of silver ornaments without their possession. While doing so, the petitioners, with the help of other caused injuries by fisting on the face of the de facto consent from their accused. complainant. Wound certificate is not yet received to ascertain the nature of injuries. Some more witnesses have to be examined and some more accused have to be arrested. Thus, the investigation in this case is at progressive stage. Enlarging the petitioners at this juncture may not arise even though they have been in judicial custody for the past 37 days pursuant to their arrest on 13-07-2025. Based on the statements of the witnesses so far, the accusation is well established. Hence, the request for enlarging the petitioners at this juncture would not arise. There are no merits in the petition. 7. The criminal petition is accordingly dismissed. A 0 PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1- The Station House Officer, District. 2. One CC to Sri Gowri Sankar Cheekatia 3. Two CC's to the Public Prosecutor, 4. Three CD Copies Proddatur I Town P.S. Proddatur, Kadapa Advocate [OPUC] High Court of A.P. [OUT] GPC HIGH COURT DATED: 18/08/2025 ORDER CRLP NO. 8349 OF 2025 p-’l r r*., / 0 DISMISSING THIS CRIMINAL PETITION