APHC010087822021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5111/2021 Between: 1. CHENNAMSETTY MURALI KRISHNA,, S/O. KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.14/600, GOPALA SWAMY STREET, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. . ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 1 TOWN POLICE STATION, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. MARKAPURAM MURALI KRISHNA, S/O. LATE VENKATESU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2/247, BALAJI NAGAR, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in 2 the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 3rd respondent, at the instance of 5th respondent in insisting petitioner to appear before his authority and yield to the terms of latter connected to civil disputes pending adjudication before the learned Court of Principle Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa in O.S. No. 308 of 2020 and further insisting petitioner to vacate from his shop bearing Door No. 19/646 in S.L.V.Plaza, R.K.M.Street, Kadapa City, Kadapa District, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners life, liberty and possession over his said shop and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents, particularly 3rd respondent not to insist petitioner to appear before his authority nor interfere with possession of petitioner's shop bearing Door No. 19/646 in S.L.V.Plaza, R.K.M.Street, Kadapa City, Kadapa District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. MANOHAR REDDY MALLASANI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 3rd respondent, at the instance of 5th respondent in insisting petitioner to appear before his authority and yield to the terms of latter connected to civil disputes pending adjudication before the learned Court of Principle Junior Civil Judge, Kadapa in O.S.No.308 of 2020 and further insisting petitioner to vacate from his shop bearing Door No.19/646 in S.L.V.Plaza, R.K.M.Street, Kadapa City, Kadapa District, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioners life liberty and possession over his said shop and pass such other order or orders…= 2. Heard Sri N.Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent authorities are unnecessarily interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the Police are not interfering in the civil dispute between the parties. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent authorities are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute except under due process of law. No costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 15.10.2025 JLV 5 181 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5111 of 2021 Dated: 15.10.2025 JLV