Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49423 (KAR)

SMT SHAKILA KHANUM v. SRI SHOUKATH PASHA

RFA/466/2023 · 2025-09-16

K S Hemalekha

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.466 OF 2023 BETWEEN SMT. SHAKILA KHANUM, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS WIFE OF MEHAMOOD SHARIEF, RESIDING AT D.NO.1681, 3RD CROSS, SHIVRAMCHAR LAYOUT HBR III BLOCK BANGALORE-560033 AND ALSO R/AT NO.837, 11TH CROSS NEAR TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, BANGALORE-560043. ….Appellant (By Sriyuths. Irshad Ahmed K, Anwar Sultana, Advocates) AND SRI. SHOUKATH PASHA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, SON OF LATE ABDUL BASHEER, R/AT GHOUSIA NAGARA MOHALLA, RAMANAGARAM-571511. …Respondent (By Sriyuths V.Vishwanath Setty, Advocate for Respondent, Tajuddin for M/s. Taj and Taj law Associates, Advocates for C/R) RFA.No.466/2023 -------------------------- 2 This Regular First Appeal filed U/S 96 R/w order XLI Rule 1 of CPC, against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.01.2023 passed in O.S. No.147/2014 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Ramanagara, Decreeing the suit for specific performance. This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Four weeks time is granted for filing paper book, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed, without reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Vide Court Order dated.16.09.2025, the Advocate for Appellant has not filed the paper Book. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- [[[[[[[[[[[[[ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : BR R By : RM C By : STE