[2025:RJ-JP:43116] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 13996/2025 Sunil Kumar S/o Sitaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Shyampura, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar At Present Patwari, Patwar Halka, Khandelsar, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaideep Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025 1. The present second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Sunil Kumar S/o Sitaram, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.213/2025 Dated 19.08.2025 registered at P.S. C.P.S. Jaipur District – Jaipur, for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time. [2025:RJ-JP:43116] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13996/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file after filing of charge-sheet and now charge-sheet has been filed. He further submits that neither there was any demand nor pendency of any work and without any reason, the present petitioner was arrayed as an accused by the ACB. He also submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner accused. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On basis of complaint lodged by complainant Jhabarmal Khokhr about demand of ₹15000/- by petitioner accused Sunil Kumar for recording mutation, a trap was led after verification and the present petitioner was arrested while accepting bribe on 18.08.2025. As per prosecution, ₹3000/- was recovered from possession of the present petitioner and after investigation charge-sheet is filed and the present petitioner is in custody since his arrest. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, [2025:RJ-JP:43116] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13996/2025] the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8. Thus, the instant second bail application filed on behalf of applicant-accused Sunil Kumar S/o Sitaram, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail provided he would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/160