SALEEM SHAH v. SWAPAN SHARMA COMMISSIONER OF POLICE LUDHIANA AND OTHERS
COCP/4629/2025 · 2026-02-16
Nidhi Gupta
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4942 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4942 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN T 105
Saleem Sha
Swapan Sh
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
order dated this Court i and others” was directe petitioner w
order in acc the meantim liberty of th
Mr. Swapan respondent be taken on COCP-4629-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.4629 of
Date of decision : m Shah Versus an Sharma, Commissioner of Police, L
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH
Mr. Anil Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG P Inspector Avneet Kaur, SHO, Po Ludhiana.
I GUPTA J. (Oral)
Present contempt petition has be dated 31.7.2025 (Annexure P-1) passe ourt in CWP-8133-2025 titled as “Sale rs”, whereby respondent No.2-Comm irected “…to decide the aforesaid rep er within a period of one month from n accordance with law and take necess antime, the official respondents are di of the petitioner.” Compliance Report dated 15.2. wapan Sharma, IPS, Commissioner of P ndent No.1 has been filed in the Court t ken on record. Copy thereof is supplie
1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 629 of 2025 (O & M) sion :-16.02.2026 …..Petitioner lice, Ludhiana and others …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA AAG Punjab assisted by O, Police Station Dehlon, has been filed alleging violation of passed by a co-ordinate Bench of
“Saleem Shah vs. State of Punjab Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana representation submitted by the from today by passing a speaking cessary action, if so required. In e directed to protect the life and 15.2.2026 by way of affidavit of er of Police, Ludhiana, on behalf of ourt today. The same is ordered to upplied to learned counsel for the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.17 09.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
petitioner. paper-book.
compliance submitted b a Speaking second part life and libe threat perce Writ Court 30.8.2025, Sections 11 been registe
required to b
February 1 Vijay Asija
Whether spe Whether Rep
COCP-4629-2025 (O & M) . Registry to tag/paginate the sam book.
Learned counsel for the Stat liance of the first part of the Writ Court itted by the petitioner has been decided b aking Order dated 01.12.2025 (Annexu d part of the direction that the responde nd liberty of the petitioner, it is submitt perception to the petitioner. It is subm Court order dated 31.7.2025, an in 025, in respect of which, an FIR No ns 115(2), 333, 126(2), 351(2), 61(2), registered at Police Station Dehlon, Distr Heard. In view of the above said pos red to be passed in the present contempt p Hence, the present contempt peti Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh 16, 2026
Asija
er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No
2 e same at appropriate place in the e State has pointed out that in Court direction, the representation cided by the respondents by passing nnexure R-1/T). In respect of the spondents provide protection to the ubmitted that as of now there is no submitted that after passing of the an incident had taken place on R No.121 dated 31.8.2025, under 61(2), 191(3) and 190 of BNS has , District Ludhiana. id position, no further orders are empt petition. pt petition stands dismissed. any, shall stand(s) disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.17 09.30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document