RAJESH SINGH RAJPUT v. U O I STAFF SELECTION COMM ORS
CW/5325/2012 · 2025-10-09
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49402 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49402 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41125] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5325/2012 Rajesh Singh Rajpat S/o Prahlad Singh B/c Rajput, Deenar, Post Deena, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Union of India Through Under Secretary, Staff Selection Commission, North Region, New Delhi.
2. The Inspector General, Ftr H.q. Bsf, Mandor Road, Jodhpur Rajasthan
3. The Presiding Officer, Scrutiny Board, Ftr Hq Bsf, Mandor Road, Jodhpur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Shekhawat, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mishra, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 09/10/2025 The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with the following prayer :-
“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your Lordships may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and call for the entire record pertaining to the present matter and quash and set aside the order dt.25.10.2011 and also directed the respondents to consider the case of petitioner as per medical fitness certificate issued by the Government Hospital, Alwar and to give him appointment on the post of Constable GD alongwith all consequential benefits. Any other order which your Lordships may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumferences of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner alongwith costs”.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in the present matter, the process for selection on the post of Constable GD has already been completed and, hence, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
[2025:RJ-JP:41125] (2 of 2) [CW-5325/2012]
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, while supporting the aforesaid submission, has prayed that the present writ petition may be
disposed of accordingly. In view of above, nothing survives in the present writ petition and, therefore, the same is, hereby, disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J. ASHOK/