- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37971 RSA No. 1745 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1745 OF 2013 (INJ) BETWEEN: K N ESHWARAPPA S/O NANJE GOWDA, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS 1(A) SMT NANJAMMA, AGED 70 YEARS, 1(B) ANNAPPASWAMY AGED 40 YEARS, 1(C) KUBERAPPA AGED 35 YEARS, 1(D) PARVATHAMMA AGED 55 YEARS, 1(E) NAGAMMA AGED 35 YEARS, 1(F) LEELAVATHI AGED 30 YEARS, 1(A) IS THE WIFE AND 1(B) TO 1(F) ARE CHILDREN OF ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF AND ALL ARE R/AT KURUBARHALLI VILLAGE, MATTIGATTA POST, KASABA HOBLI,KADUR TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT- 577548 …APPELLANTS (V/O DTD 19.09.2025 NOTICE TO A TO F ARE H/S (ABSENT)) Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37971 RSA No. 1745 of 2013 AND: 1. RAJAPPA AGED 45 YEARS, S/O HALAPPA, 2. MUDDAMMA AGED 50 YEARS, D/O LATE HALAPPA, BOTH ARE R/AT KURUBARAHALLI VILLAGE, MATTIGATTA POST,KASABA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT- 577548 3. CHANDRAMMA AGED 50 YEARS, D/O K N ESHWARAPPA, R/AT KURUBARAHALLI VILLAGE, MATTIGATTA POST,KASABA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT- 577548 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D L SURESH., ADVOCATE FOR R1; V/O DTD 28.03.2025, R3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD 3.8.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.25/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., KADUR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 12.6.2008 PASSED IN O.S.NO.192/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., KADUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37971 RSA No. 1745 of 2013 ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal was listed on 19.09.2025. Notice to the appellants was issued as the counsel for the appellants had expired. Notice issued to some of the legal representatives of the appellants were served. This court directed the Registry to show the names of all the appellants in the cause list. The matter was ordered to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' in case of no representation. 2. Today there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7