SANJAY KUMAR DHINVA S/O BAJRANG LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13364/2025 · 2025-10-15
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49393 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49393 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13364/2025 Sanjay Kumar Dhinva S/o Bajrang Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Surjanpura Tan Devgao, Police Station Gothra, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virender Godara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta.Dy.GA/PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 15/10/2025
1. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.23/2025, registered at Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 333, 140(4), 109(1), 324(4), 117 (2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation of causing head injury has been levelled against the co-accused Shivanshu Dhaka, while allegations of causing injuries on the legs have been levelled against the petitioner along with co-accused persons namely Pradeep Kumar and Bunty Singh, Vikas Singh, Ashish and Anurag, who have already been granted indulgence of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.03.2025. Counsel submits that the case of the petitioner is at par with them and
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-13364/2025] trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, same indulgence be granted to the petitioner as well.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that causing head injury has been levelled against the co-accused Shivanshu Dhaka, while allegations of causing injuries on the legs have been levelled against the petitioner along with co-accused persons namely Pradeep Kumar and Bunty Singh, Vikas Singh, Ashish and Anurag, who have already been granted indulgence of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.03.2025 and looking to the fact that the case of the petitioner is at par with them and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS.
5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Sanjay Kumar Dhinva S/o Bajrang Lal arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/239