Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040015202025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/132/2025 Yukar Sivo Son of Yukar Tama, permanent resident of Bam, PO and PS Raga, Kamle District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Xavier Gyati, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Begi Taba BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 17-09-2025 Heard Mr. Xavier Gyati, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Token Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh and Mr. Begi Taba, learned counsel for the informant. 2. Apprehending his arrest in connection with the Raga P.S. Case No. 19/2025 under Sections 192/118(1)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 the applicant has filed this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail. Page No.# 2/3 3. Vide order dated 05.09.2025, this Court granted interim anticipatory bail to the accused applicant, in connection with the above Police Station case on the following conditions: (i) that the applicant shall execute a bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of like amount; (ii) that the applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for in connection with the investigation of the aforesaid P.S. Case; (iii) that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iv) that the applicant shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Court without prior permission of the concerned jurisdictional Court. 4. In compliance with the above directions, the accused applicant appeared before the Investigating Officer of the case on 08.09.2025 and had his police statement recorded. Upon his appearance, he was arrested by the Investigating Officer, executed the bail bond and was subsequently, released on bail pursuant to the interim anticipatory bail order passed by this Court. 5. Case Diary produced before this Court indicates that the accused applicant has been cooperating with the investigation of the case and his statement has been recorded. The Case Diary placed before this Court also indicates that Page No.# 3/3 custodial interrogation of the accused is no longer required. 6. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State though raised objection to the filing of pre-arrest bail before the High Court directly, however, fairly submitted that the accused has been cooperating with the investigation of the case. 7. In view of the above and consideration that the accused has already been arrested and subsequently, released on bail, his statement has been recorded and further considering that the custodial interrogation of the accused is no longer required, this Court is of the opinion that interim anticipatory bail granted to the accused is liable to be made absolute. 8. Accordingly, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the accused on 05.09.2025 is hereby regularised and made absolute, subject to the same terms and conditions as imposed in the interim order with the further condition that the accused applicant shall continue to cooperate and appear before the Investigating Officer and the Trial Court, as and when called for. 9. This bail order shall be read along with the interim anticipatory bail order dated 05.09.2025 10. with the above, the present anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant