APHC010342842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1710/2025 Between: 1. G. PAPARAO, S/O. G.DAVEEDU, AGE 57 YEARS, WORKING AS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MINES GEOLOGY, ON DEPUTATION TO A.P.M.D.C., VIJAYAWADA ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRAVEEN KUMAR IAS, SECRETARY TO GOVT. INDUSTRIES COMMERCE, (MINES GEOLOGY) ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR 2. SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR IAS, COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR OF MINES GEOLOGY SRI ANJANEYA TOWRS, 5TH FLOOR B BLOCK IBRAHIMPATNAM, N.T.R.DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the Respondents / contemnors under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act for deliberately, willfully and Intentionally violating the orders 3. in W.P. No.5938/2024 dated passed by the Hon’ble High Court 13.7.2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V RAMANA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 2 1. RAMAKRISHNA PATIVADA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Heard Sri P.V.Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ramakrishna Pativada, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The above contempt case was filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 30.07.2024 in W.P.No.5938 of 2024. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the 2nd respondent had forwarded a proposal to the 1st respondent for declaration of probation and for finalisation of seniority, vide Letter No.42180/E1/2013 dated 28.04.2025, in the cadre of Deputy Director of Mines and Geology working in the Department. The name of the petitioner was also included in the said proposal. The proposal is presently under examination by the Government. 4. The said communication is placed before this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner endorses the same. A perusal of the communication, the petitioner’s name is indeed included. 5. Given the facts and circumstances, this court doesn’t find any violation and thus, the contempt case is closed for the time being. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 17.10.2025 SNI 3 223 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1710/ 2025 Date: 17.10.2025 SNI