Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010093082017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION Nos: 10394 & 22413 of 2017
W.P.No.10394 of 2017: Between:
1. KAKARLA SUJATHA, W/O. LATE SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC:HOUSE WIFE, R/O. THULIUM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR COMPETENT AUTHORITY, CRDA, INAVOLU VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR COMPETENT AUTHORITY, CRDA MANDADAM VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. KAKARLA ANANTHA LAKSHMI, W/O. LATE ROSAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. THULIUM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 5. KAKARLA SUSEELA, W/O. LATE MURALI PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. THULLURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2
6. JONNALAGADDA SUREKHA, W/O. SUDHEER, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, C/O. SMT. KAKARLA SUSEELD, R/O.
ANANTHAVARAM VILLAGE, PONDUGULA POST, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. KAKARLA PRABHAKARA RAO, S/O. LATE ROSAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THULLURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 8. KAKARLA INDIRA, W/O. PRABHAKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. THULIUM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 9. KAKARLA RAJASEKHAR, S/O. PRABHAKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,. OCC:.AGRICULTURIST, R/O. THULLURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A RAGHAVAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
2. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA
W.P.No.22413 of 2017: Between:
1. KAKARLA ANANTHA LAKHSMI, W/O LATE ROSAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC: PROPERTIES, R/O THULLURU VILLAGE & MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY IT'S PRL. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, IDOLINIZILMAD. ,N'NOVOCATILL D- 14/
2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT, AUTHORITY, REP. BY IT'S COMMISSIONER CUM MEMBER CONVENER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3
3. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CRDA, SAKHAMURU UNIT, TADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. KAKARLA SUJATHA, W/O LATE SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O THULLURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. HANUMANTHA RAO VELLALACHERVU
2.
GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
3. S PRANATHI
The Court made the following:
ORAL COMMON ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.10394 of
2017. 2. Heard Sri B. Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.22413 of 2017 as well Counsel for the Respondents in W.P.No.10394 of 2017, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Ms. S. Lakshmi Prameela, learned Counsel representing Sri Hanumantha Rao V, learned Counsel for the Respondents in W.P.No.22413 of 2017 and Sri A. Ram Dheeraj, learned Counsel representing Smt. S. Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel for APCRDA. Both the Writ Petitions are connected. 3. Sri B. Sreenivasa Rao Velivela, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that W.P.No.22413 of 2017 has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, Writ Petition bearing W.P.No.22413 of 2017 is disposed of as having become infructuous. 4
5. In view of the disposal of W.P.No.22413 of 2017 as having become infructuous and that there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.10394 of 2017, it is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 10.12.2025 Vns