Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49384 (PNJ)

RAJPAL KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/22765/2025 · 2025-07-28

Amarjot Bhatti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22765-2025 Date of Decision:- 28.07.2025 Rajpal Kaur ....Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. Ajay Singh Pundir, Advocate for Mr. Nirmaljeet Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, Assistant A.G. Punjab. ***** AMARJOT BHATTI, J. (Oral) 1. Learned proxy counsel representing petitioner requested for an adjournment. Even on the earlier date, regular counsel did not appear and presence of proxy counsel was marked. 2. Status report already received. I have considered the petition as well as status report filed in this case. Petitioner Rajpal Kaur filed petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for issuance of directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 to take appropriate legal action against respondent No. 4 on her representation (Annexure P-2). As per status report, matter was inquired by Inspector Parvinder Singh, SHO of Police Station Kotwali Bathinda. Statement of petitioner Rajpal Kaur was recorded who conceded her relationship with Deep Singh @ Deepu for last about 10 years. They started residing together at Amritsar. They lived there for about two years and then shifted to Bathinda in the year 2024. Due to domestic dispute, LALIT SHARMA 2025.07.28 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-22765-2025 -2- Deep Singh @ Deepu deserted her. She was three months pregnant. Now, matter has been reconciled. She has given birth to a girl child on 11.06.2025 and they have started living together peacefully. It was further confirmed that there was no complaint against each other and wanted to withdraw present case. 3. In the light of status report referred above, no further action is required. Parties have reconciled. Therefore, present petition stands disposed of having rendered infructuous. 4. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 28.07.2025 lalit Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No LALIT SHARMA 2025.07.28 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document