[2025:RJ-JP:43778] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 160/2015 Ranvir Singh, aged about 64 years, S/o Shri Ramji Lal, R/o House No.9, Pratap Nagar, Gangwa Road, Hissar (Haryana). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Smt. Krishna Devi D/o Sh. Chandgiram, aged about 41 years, R/o Village Chilaro, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendra Garh, Haryana. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4546/2014 Ranvir Singh, aged about 64 years, S/o Shri Ramji Lal, R/o House No.9, Pratap Nagar, Gangwa Road, Hissar (Haryana). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Smt. Ram Pyari Devi, W/o Shri Yaad Ram, R/o Sareli, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendra Garh, Haryana. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4547/2014 Ranvir Singh, aged about 64 years, S/o Shri Ramji Lal, R/o House No.9, Pratap Nagar, Gangwa Road, Hissar (Haryana). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through PP 2. Smt. Sarita Yadav W/p Karan Singh, R/o Koriyawas, Police Station Narnaul, District Mahendra Garh, Haryana. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4548/2014 Ranvir Singh, aged about 64 years, S/o Shri Ramji Lal, R/o House No.9, Pratap Nagar, Gangwa Road, Hissar (Haryana). ----Petitioner Versus [2025:RJ-JP:43778] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-160/2015] 1. State Of Rajasthan through PP 2. Karan Singh, S/o Chhotey Lal, R/o Koriyawas, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendra Garh, Haryana. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 161/2015 Ranvir Singh S/o Shri Ramji Lal, R/o House No. 9, Pratap Nagar, Gangwa Road, Hissar Haryana ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through PP 2. Praveen Sharma S/o Shri Om Prakash Sharma, R/o Village Sareli, Tehsil Narnaul, Distt. Mahendra Garh, Haryana ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kumawat on behalf of Mr. Abhinav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Deepak Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 01/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of criminal miscellaneous petitions, the petitioner has died, therefore, these petitions have become infructuous. 2. In view of above statements, the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH-GARIMA/42-46