TANVEER ANSARI ALIAS MD. TANWIR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1020/2025 · 2025-02-14
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4938 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4938 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1020 of 2025
------ Md. Tanveer Ansari @ Md. Tanwir Ansari, aged about 26 years, son of late Kalim Ansari, resident of near Kids Garden School, Chauthai Kulhi, P.O. & P.S.-Jharia, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State
: Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 14.02.2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Dhanbad G.R.P.S. No.77 of 2024 registered under sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code.
The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of purse of the informant containing ATM card, pan card, cash of Rs.5,000/- and a mobile phone from Dhanbad railway station. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the mobile phone has been recovered from the co-accused- Sufiana Khatoon, who claimed to have purchased the same from the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the anticipatory bail application and the petitioner has not committed any offence. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, in connection with Dhanbad G.R.P.S. No.77 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-