OM NARAYAN YADAV v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION CIVIL, LINES, NAGPUR
APL/758/2024 · 2025-03-27
Shri Anil S Kilor, Shri Pravin S Patil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49376 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49376 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 13apl758.24.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO.758 OF 2024 [Om Narayan Yadav .vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, Civil Lines, Nagpur] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri H.R. Nanoti, Advocate with Shri M. Puranik, Advocate for Applicant. Shri P.K. Sathianathan, Advocate for Respondent. …………...
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 27, 2025
. In the present matter, the prayer is for direction to the learned Trial Court to decide the trial expeditiously within a period of six months.
2. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, time and again, deprecated such practice expediting the trials without sufficient data available on record as regards the pendency of the matters before such court.
3. In the present matter, no such data is given in the application and considering the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan and others .vs. Pasumpon Muthuramalingam and another, reported in 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 298, such prayer cannot be granted. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.)
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) Gulande