Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49375 (AP)

HANSA JAIN v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/32069/2025 · 2025-11-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010619182025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32069/2025 Between: 1. HANSA JAIN, W/O MR. KAMLESH KUMAR JAIN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BUSINESSWOMAN, R/O 3-4-468/2, DMR VIMAL KUNJ, BARKATPURA, NARAYANGUDA, HYDERABAD,TELANGANA. PRESENTLY MANAGING THE AFFAIRS OF J.B.F.M.S. COMPANY, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 26-12-364/2, NEAR RTO OFFICE ROAD, BV NAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 524004. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THES H O, VEDAYAPALEM POLICE STATION, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. MR V B REDDY, OWNER OF THE PREMISES SITUATED AT 26-12- 364/2, NEAR RTO OFFICE ROAD, BV NAGAR, VEDAYAPALEM, NELLORE - 524004. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SATYA SREENIVASA RAO K Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to 1. Issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondent Nos. 3 in not taking action upon the Petitioner's complaint dated 04.11.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India 2. Direct the 2 Respondent No.3Police Inspector, Vedayapalem Police Station, Nellore, to register and investigate the Petitioner's complaint dated 04.11.2025 against the Unofficial Respondent Mr. V. B. Reddy and others for their criminal acts of intimidation, trespass, and unlawful eviction attempts 3. Direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to provide adequate police protection to the Petitioner and her son Mr. Sonu Jain from any further threats or unlawful interference by the Unofficial Respondent or his associates 4. Pass an interim order restraining the Unofficial Respondent from dispossessing or interfering with the Petitioner's peaceful possession and management of the JBFMS Head Office at 26-12-364/2, BV Nagar, Vedayapalem, Nellore, pending disposal of this Writ Petition.” 2. Heard Sri Satya Sreenivasa Rao.K, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the police have not registered a crime based on the petitioner’s representation, as the subject matter is purely civil in nature. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 19.11.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32069 of 2025 Dt..19.11.2025 ASR