Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49372 (RAJ)

GIRRAJ YADAV S/O SHRI SITA RAM v. STATE

CRLMA/642/2025 · 2025-12-11

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50355] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 642/2025 In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 208/2007 Girraj Yadav S/o Shri Sita Ram, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Village Basa Brijnathpura, Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur. ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Yogesh Kalla, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Madhusudan Purohit, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 11/12/2025 1. The present criminal miscellaneous application has been filed on behalf of the accused-applicant seeking extension of time to deposit the amount of fine in terms of the order dated 09.07.2025 passed by this Court. 2. While disposing of the S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 208/2007, this Court on 09.07.2025, has passed the following order:- "bu leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, ;g ;kfpdk vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj ;kph ds fo#) fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 457 o 380@511 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa dh xbZ nks"kflf) dh iqf"V djrs gq, ;kph ds fo#) ikfjr n.Mkns'k dks mlds }kjk Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk esa ifjofrZr fd;k tkuk mfpr le>k tkrk gSA pwafd ;kph }kjk tks ltk Hkqxr yh xbZ gS mlds vk/kkj ij ;kph dks NksM+k tk jgk gSA vr% ;kph dks vksj ltk Hkqxrus dh vko';drk ugha gSA [2025:RJ-JP:50355] (2 of 2) [CRLMA-642/2025] fdUrq ;kph dks vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ;kph ds fo#) tks 1]000@& #i;s dk vFkZn.M yxk;k x;k gS] ml vFkZn.M dks ;kph ;g fu.kZ; ikfjr gksus ds rhu ekg dh vof/k esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa tek djok,xk] vU;Fkk ,d ekg dk lk/kkj.k dkjkokl HkqxrsxkA" 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that in regard with the aforesaid order to deposit the amount of fine by the accused-applicant, he could not inform the same in time to the accused-applicant. 4. As per the aforesaid order of this Court, the accused- applicant was directed to deposit fine of Rs.1,000/- within a period of three months from the date of passing of the order dated 09.07.2025, but the accused-applicant has failed to deposit the amount of fine, since the counsel for the accused-applicant could not inform the accused-applicant in time, therefore, the present application of extension for depositing the fine has been filed. 5. In that view of the matter, the accused-applicant is directed to deposit the fine of Rs.1,000/- in compliance of the order dated 09.07.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 208/2007 within a period of two weeks from today, failing which the learned trial Court shall be free to issue arrest warrant against the accused-applicant in order to comply with the aforesaid order and subsequently, the accused-applicant shall serve the sentence of one month in default of payment of fine. 6. Accordingly, the present criminal miscellaneous application stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /10