Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49371 (CHH)

UTKRISHT BIJ UTPADAK SAHKARI SAMITI MARYADIT KAKRI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5889/2025 · 2025-11-10

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:54780 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5889 of 2025 Utkrisht Bij Utpadak Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Kakri Berkhedi, Tehsil Devri Distt- Sagar Madhya Pradesh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary Agriculture Development And Farmers Welfare And Biotechnology Department Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh, 2 - Chhattisgarh State Seed And Agriculture Development Corporation Limited Through- Managing Director, Bijh Bhawan J.E. Road I, Telibandha Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Chairman Chhattisgarh State Seed And Agriculture Development Corporation Limited, Through Managing Director Bijh Bhawan, J.E. Road I, Telibandha Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Vibhor Goverdhan, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1 : Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A. For Respondent No.2 and 3 : Mr. Rajendra Patel, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.S. Baghel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.13 10:37:09 +0530 2 11/11/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to call the records pertaining to the petitioner’s case. 10.2 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider and decide petitioner representations (Annexure P-1) as per law and further direct the respondent authorities to pay the outstanding dues to the petitioner within 30 days, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to remove the petitioner’s society blacklisting, in the interest of justice. 10.4 That any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and just may also kindly be granted” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at present he is only seeking relief No.10.2 of direction to the concerned respondent to consider and take decision on the pending representation. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that pursuant to the rate contract, he supplied seeds to respondents No. 2 and 3, though part payment has been disbursed in his favour but some portion of amount towards supply of seeds is still withheld by respondent No.2 and 3. When after several oral request, amount has not been disbursed/released, he submitted representation (Annexure P-1) in the year 2023, which till date has not been considered and no decision has been taken, therefore, a direction be issued to respondents No.2 and 3 to take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner. 3 4. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 would submit that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner to take decision on the pending representation submitted by petitioner, he is having no objection. He also submits that if the representation is still pending consideration, it will be considered and appropriate decision will be taken on the representation, in accordance with law. 5. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents placed on record. 6. Taking into consideration facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised and the relief which is sought for taking decision on the pending representation, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to take decision on the representation dated 06.09.2023 in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Considering that representation submitted by petitioner is of the year 2023, petitioner will be at liberty to submit fresh representation if he so desire. If such representation is submitted, concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner also along with pending representation. It is ordered accordingly. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram