Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49369 (CHH)

ASHUTOSH PATRE v. SMT. SHAHLA NIGAR

CONT/1622/2025 · 2025-11-13

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:55603 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1622 of 2025 1 - Ashutosh Patre S/o Shri Shyam Sunder Patre Aged About 34 Years Presently Working As Rural Agriculture Extension Officer In The Office Of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur, C.G. R/o Village- Sonpuri, Tehsil- Mungeli, Distt.- Mungeli, (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Shahla Nigar Secretary, Department Of Agriculture Development And Farmer Welfare And Bio- Technology, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Mr. Rahul Dev Director, Directorate Of Agriculture, Block- 2, Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Mr. Manoj Kumar Chouhan Divisional Joint Director, Agriculture Division, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Divya Goutam Sub Divisional Agriculture Officer, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, (C.G.) 5 - Mr. Pancham Das Hatheshwar Deputy Director, Agriculture, Bilaspur, Distt.- Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Mr. Ashwani Kumar Satpal Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 7 - Mr. Deepak Kumar Nayak Deputy Director Agriculture Balodabazar, Distt.- Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.11.14 17:52:16 +0530 2 ... Respondent(s) (Cause title as taken from Case Information System) For Applicant : Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocate appears through Video Conferencing with Ms. Bharti Khunte, Advocate appears in person. For Respondent/s : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 14/11/2025 1. Heard. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant would submit that instant contemp petition may be disposed of as the order under contempt has been complied with and the awaited salary of the applicant for the period of four months has been disbursed in his salary account. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent has not opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 4. In view of the above, since order under contempt has been complied with, this contemp petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi