Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:69620 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13289 of 2025 Petitioner :- Devendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kandarp Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Pursuant to the earlier order, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner could not justify filing of the instant writ petition as the instant writ petition is only against the recovery notice, which is always in consequence of an order. In view of the above as well as the judgements of the Apex Court in United Bank of India Vs. Satyawati Tondon & Others [(2010) 8 SCC 110] (paragraph no. 43), Radha Krishan Industries Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others [(2021) 6 SCC 771] (paragraph nos. 27.3 and 27.5) and Varimadugu Obi Reddy Vs. B. Sreenivasulu & Others [(2023) 2 SCC 168] (paragraph no. 36), the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy at this stage. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Amit Mishra Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad