Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49368 (RAJ)

MUKESH CHAND MEENA SON OF SHRI BABURAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16056/2025 · 2025-11-24

Sandeep Taneja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47545] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16056/2025 Mukesh Chand Meena Son Of Shri Baburam Meena, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Village Shekhpura Tehsil Todabhim District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Energy, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chairman And Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur. 3. Superintending Engineer (Kusum), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur. 4. M/s Emirates Electricals, Prince Place, 154A, 154B, Ayoghya Nagar, Gandhi Path, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur- 302201. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Meyhul Mittal for Mr. Shubhang Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sagar Jindal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 24/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy available to him under Section 38 of Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 2012. Learned counsel further submits that since time to file appeal has already expired, therefore, authority concerned may be directed to consider the appeal within limitation. [2025:RJ-JP:47545] (2 of 2) [CW-16056/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not object to the said submission. 3. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, counsel for the petitioner is permitted to file appeal within a period of ten days from today. 4. If any appeal is filed by petitioner within ten days from today before the appellate authority, the appellate authority is directed to consider the appeal within limitation and decide the appeal on merits. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J ashu /16