Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49357 (AP)

M/s PMR Infrastructures Private Limited, v. Mr. Shashibushan Kumar,

CC/1933/2017 · 2025-12-02

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010642742017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1933/2017 Between: 1. M/S PMR INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,, OFFICE AT PLOT NO.3, DOOR NO.6-3-680/8/3, THAKUR MANSION, SOMAJ IGUDA, HYDERABAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR P. MOHAN REDDY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MR SHASHIBUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT COMPLEX, IST FLOOR, 4TH BLOCK, VELAGAPUDI, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522237, 2. MR NARAYAN REDDY, CHIEF ENGINEER, (PROJECTS), WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518004, 3. MR S CHANDRA SEKHARA RAO, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH-518004. 4. MR E MALLIKARJUNA, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, K.C. CANAL DIVISION, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: It transpires from the record that on the last three occasions, i.e., on 03.11.2017, 13.11.2025 & 19.11.2025 there was no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Having noted the same on 19.11.2025, this Court had directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption 8For Dismissal9. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. 2. In this view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is dismissed for Non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.12.2025 DSV 111 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1933/2017 03.12.2025 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1933/2017 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 04. 03.12.2025 GRKP, J Contempt Case is dismissed for Non prosecution. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV